Wide field views in Winter
Skies by Steve Coe
Advertisements shout about the high magnifications
available using their telescope. There is no doubt that high magnifications
yield beautiful views of the Moon, planets and fine detail in some deep
sky objects. However, many objects in the sky are too large to fit into
the field of view of a high power eyepiece. These objects demand a wide
field of view to appreciate their beauty and delicate form.
There are several ways to view large areas of the
sky. The simplest is naked eye. Your eye, when properly dark adapted,
is a marvelous instrument. Stepping up to a pair of binoculars will help
a lot. The added light gathering power of the lens system in a pair of
binoculars will allow you to see much fainter celestial objects. Along
these same lines, a finder scope on most telescopes is a monocular (half
a binocular). This small refractor can provide some excellent rich field
views.
The biggest advantage of binoculars is that they
are easily portable. What can be simpler than carrying a pair of binoculars
out to an observing site? Any set of optics that can be carried on a bicycle
with ease has the portability edge. The disadvantage of binoculars is
aperture.
Common size ranges for binocs are:
7X35, 7X50, 10X50, 11X80, 15X80 and 20X80.
Remember that the first number is the magnification
and the second number is the aperture in millimeters. In these sizes they
are quite affordable and easy to transport. Moving to binoculars with
an aperture of 100mm and up will raise the price considerably. For those
reasons, let's stick to the convenient sizes for this discussion.
In magnifications of 10X and above the weight of
the binocs becomes a factor to consider. As your arms tire, it becomes
difficult to hold them steady enough for the kind of view they are capable
of delivering. For this reason it is wise to consider some kind of support
for high power binoculars. Many varieties of binocular supports have been
described and photographed in Telescope Making Magazine over the years.
If you don't feel comfortable constructing your own stand then there are
several types of tripods available thru advertisers in Astronomy Magazine
or at better camera stores in your area. Most large, modern binocs come
with a tripod adaptor which have a standard thread that fits the tripod
head. This will allow you to easily mount the binocs on a sturdy support.
The support will provide a field of view which will not jiggle as you
observe because of tired, cold hands.
Moving up to a small telescope will allow you to
look at dimmer objects than the binoculars because of the larger aperture.
To gather up wide areas of the sky in a telescope there are two approaches.
The first is the addition of an adaptor in the light path of a long focal
length telescope. These rich field adaptors will change the size of the
light cone within the telescope and a wider field of view will result.
The disadvantage is that the adaptors introduce some curvature in the
field. This distortion can be bothersome. The other method of achieving
a wide field telescope is to grind the mirrors to a short focal length
initially. This kind of telescope is usually a Newtonian and they are
called RFT's for Rich Field Telescopes. The disadvantage to RFT's is that
they do not easily operate at high powers. Basically, one telescope cannot
do it all. This is a common problem in this world, it is very tough to
build a truck that could win the Indy 500.
Many commercial telescope makers are manufacturing
RFT's in some form. Both Meade and Celestron sell adaptors for their Schmidt-Cassegrain
telescopes. Coulter and Chicago Optical sell RFT Newtonian telescopes.
If you are looking for the widest field possible,
then a pair of 7X35 or 7X50 binocs will give a field generally between
5 and 10 degrees in size. This is about the size of the Bowl of the Big
Dipper. If you are trying to view most of a large constellation or all
of a small one, these low power binocs are just what you want.
Getting a higher power pair of binoculars will show
you dimmer stars and fainter deep sky objects. So the 10X50 and larger
binoculars are great for looking at large nebulae and star clusters.
The same can be said for RFT's. They really shine
when looking at large star clusters and bright or dark nebulae that take
up big portions of the sky. They bring out some fine detail that is tough
in large binocs because of the larger aperture available to most RFT systems.
I have had the good fortune to use several styles
of binoculars and RFT's. The simplest way to give you some information
about their performance is to provide you with some observations of wide
field objects in Fall and Winter skies. Then you can decide which type
of optical system meets your needs.
The Andromeda Galaxy is often viewed in many different
types of instruments. The galaxy is bright enough to be seen naked eye
from many sites. It only starts to show off its' grandeur in medium binoculars.
The dark lanes are not visible in my 10X50 binocs, even at the best of
sites. However, moving up to a pair of 20X80's makes a big difference.
This frames the Andromeda Galaxy nicely with
about one degree of sky around the spiral arms. The dark lanes are evident
on a good evening and the companion galaxies can be seen with ease. Within
the southern arm a bright H II region, NGC 206, is visible in the big
binoculars and the rest of the spiral arms sparkle with mottling.
The Alpha Perseus Group is a large, nearby star cluster
that surrounds the brightest star in the constellation of the Hero. In
10X50 binocs I can pick out 28 stars in the group. They are clustered
in an area about 3 degrees in diameter. The cluster aspect is lost in
higher power binoculars or an RFT.
The Double Cluster in Perseus is one of the most
famous objects that did not make Charles Messier's list. It can be seen
naked eye as a bright spot in the Winter Milky Way. A pair of 7X35 or
7X50 binocs will show the two clusters framed in a glow from unresolved
stars. Large binoculars will resolve about 40 members, some even in the
compressed central section. An 8" RFT provides the best view, however.
The light gathering ability of the telescope will show off a hundred or
so dimmer stars among the two clusters. There are several orange or yellow
stars, including one almost between the two groups. Many lovely curved
chains of stars wind their way out into the Milky Way from the edges of
the clusters.
The constellation of Orion has been a favorite of
amateur astronomers for generations. One of the reasons is that so many
different types of instruments will provide excellent views of the heavens
in this part of the sky. A pair of 7X50 or 10X50 binocs will show off
the stars in and around the Belt of Orion, this group has the designation
Collinder 70. There are about 45 stars visible in medium binoculars. They
form beautiful loops around the bright Belt stars.
The Orion Nebula has been written about for centuries.
I will say that I particularly like the region in my 11X80 finderscope
with a UHC filter in a 20mm Erfle eyepiece. The UHC gets rid of any color
from the lens system and still provides about 3 degrees of field. So the
entire Orion Nebula complex, including M42, M43 and several NGC nebulae
are in this breathtaking field of view.
The Winter Milky Way goes through Auriga and Gemini,
two constellations which pass near overhead for much of the Northern Hemisphere.
A glance at the map in the central section of Astronomy will show several
Messier clusters in this region. There are many lovely dark lanes that
wind through Our Galaxy in this area and set off the clusters like diamonds
on a velvet cloth. The 10X50 are just right for a leisurely scan through
here.
The Rosette Nebula in Monoceros is another faint
glow in the Milky Way to the naked eye. The coarse cluster in this wreath
of nebulosity is shown in 10X50 or 11X80 binocs but I have never seen
the nebula clearly in binoculars. The RFT's will show off the Rosette
at its best. Even my small 4 1/4" f/4 at 16X will bring out this
gas cloud in distant space. On a night I rated 8/10 for contrast and seeing,
I could see a few of the dark lanes within the nebula.
Because comets will occasionally form a tail of several
degrees in length, they often lend themselves best to wide field instruments.
I had several nights of interesting viewing when Comet Bradfield passed
near M10 and M12 in Ophiuchus. Comet Liller was excellent in an RFT. Binoculars
were essential for watching Comet IRAS-Araki-Alcock as it moved across
the sky in Draco. This comet passed so close to the earth, that even in
the 10X50's it would move against the star background as you observed!
Dave Fredericksen, Chris Schur and I had the good
fortune to travel to Australia in 1986 to view Comet Halley. We spent
a week in Jim Barclay's backyard near Brisbane and marveled at the southern
sky. Taking binoculars was easy and they where on hand for convenient
viewing of unfamiliar parts of the Milky Way. The 10X50's were great on
the Eta Carina Nebula, The Coalsack and The Magellanic Clouds. However,
I will never forget Comet Halley in a pair of 15X80 binocs. We happened
to be observing the comet while it was quite active. The gas tail was
very prominent and there were several layers of brightness to the coma.
The tail changed its' orientation and detail came and went from one night
to the next. The big binoculars provided a front row seat to all the action.
There are lots of objects that demand a large field
of view to see them at their best. The list will provide you with some
more deep sky vistas to observe. I hope this will start you on your way
to getting a wider view of things astronomical.
Clear Skies.
Observing
list of wide field objects in the Fall and Winter skies
| Obj |
Con |
Type |
R.A. (2000) |
Dec |
Mag |
Size(min) |
Notes |
| M 31 |
AND |
Sb |
00 41.8 |
41 16 |
4 |
160x40 |
Great Andromeda Galaxy |
| M 44 |
CNC |
OC |
08 40.1 |
19 59 |
4 |
90 |
Beehive, 200* to mag 14 |
| M 37 |
AUR |
OC |
05 52.4 |
32 33 |
6 |
24 |
very rich, about 500* |
| M 35 |
GEM |
OC |
06 08.9 |
24 20 |
6 |
29 |
NGC 2158 1/2 deg SW |
| M 45 |
TAU |
OC |
03 47.0 |
24 07 |
2 |
120 |
Pleiades, look for neby |
| M 42 |
ORI |
GN |
05 35.4 |
-05 27 |
6 |
66x60 |
Orion Neb, magnificent |
| NGC 7293 |
AQR |
PN |
22 29.6 |
-20 48 |
6.3 |
15x12 |
Helix, large, diffuse |
| NGC 457 |
CAS |
OC |
01 19.1 |
+58 20 |
6.4 |
13 |
rich, 80* |
| NGC 7789 |
CAS |
OC |
23 57.0 |
+56 44 |
6.7 |
16 |
very rich, many dim* |
| NGC 2244 |
MON |
OC |
06 32.4 |
+04 52 |
4.8 |
24 |
Rosette, OC + neby |
| NGC 869 |
PER |
OC |
02 19.0 |
+57 09 |
4.3 |
30 |
Double Cluster w/NGC 884 |
| NGC 884 |
PER |
OC |
02 22.4 |
+57 07 |
4.4 |
30 |
350* |
| NGC 253 |
SCL |
Scp |
00 47.5 |
-25 18 |
7.1 |
25x7 |
Large, mottled spiral |
| Fornax Dwarf |
FOR |
Ep |
02 39.7 |
-34 17 |
9.0 |
20 |
Low Surface Brightness |
| Sh2-276 |
ORI |
EN |
05 48.0 |
+01 00 |
--- |
600 |
Barnard's Loop |
| Mel 20 |
PER |
OC |
03 22.0 |
+49 00 |
1.2 |
185 |
Alpha Per Cluster |
| NGC 1499 |
PER |
EN |
04 03.3 |
+36 25 |
--- |
145x40 |
California Nebula |
| Scl Dwarf |
SCL |
E0 |
00 59.9 |
-33 42 |
10.5 |
75 |
Low Surface Bright |
| Cr 70 |
ORI |
OC |
05 36.0 |
-01 00 |
0.4 |
150 |
Incl Orion's Belt *s |
| Cr 140 |
CMA |
OC |
07 23.9 |
-32 12 |
4.0 |
42 |
naked eye |
| Mel 25 |
TAU |
OC |
04 27.0 |
+16 00 |
1.0 |
330 |
Hyades |
| Mel 20 |
PER |
OC |
03 22.0 |
+49 00 |
1.2 |
185 |
Alpha Per Cluster |
| Stock 2 |
CAS |
OC |
02 15.0 |
+59 16 |
4.0 |
60 |
Easy in Binoculars |
| Tr 37 |
CEP |
OC |
21 39.0 |
+57 30 |
5.1 |
50 |
30*, Invl in IC 1396 |
| References: |
| Astronomy |
Aug 81 pg. 51 |
| |
Dec 85 pg. 44 |
| |
Nov 82 pg. 39 |
| |
Dec 86 pg. 70 |
| |
Nov 86 pg. 75 |
| |
Feb 86 pg. 62 |
| Deep Sky |
July 80 pg. 8 |
|